Add evidence-near semantic architecture experiments
Record the V1-V3 experiments and accept the minimal semantic-preservation first stage.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cases": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "a_idea_only",
|
||||
"description": "Possible geometry optimization without commitment.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_a",
|
||||
"subject": "Optimierung der Geometrie",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Martin: Die Geometrie kann man vielleicht noch optimieren. Dann würde man mal gucken, was herauskommt."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Geometrie kann vielleicht optimiert werden.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"positive","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"absent"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Danach könnte betrachtet werden, was herauskommt.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"implicit","scope":"nach der Optimierung|danach"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "b_multiple_options",
|
||||
"description": "Two alternatives for insufficient grid strength.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_b",
|
||||
"subject": "Umgang mit unzureichender Festigkeit des 40-40-Gitters",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Die Festigkeit reicht für das 40-40-Gitter noch nicht aus."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Man könnte mehr Masse für die gleiche Festigkeit einsetzen."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Martin: Oder wir verkaufen es nicht als 40-40-Gitter, sondern machen ein 20-20 daraus. Das wären die zwei Ansätze."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Festigkeit reicht noch nicht aus.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"negative","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"40-40-Gitter|40-40"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Mehr Masse könnte für die gleiche Festigkeit eingesetzt werden.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"mehr Masse|gleiche Festigkeit"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Das Produkt könnte als 20-20 statt 40-40 ausgeführt werden.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"20-20|statt 40-40"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die vorherigen Möglichkeiten sind die zwei Ansätze.","target":["obs_2","obs_3"],"relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"absent"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "c_unaccepted_proposal",
|
||||
"description": "Suggested Textor contact without established work.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_c",
|
||||
"subject": "Erneute Kontaktaufnahme mit Dirk Textor zur Einschätzung",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Tim: Ich würde vielleicht Dirk Textor noch einmal kontaktieren und fragen, wie er das einschätzt."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Das kann man ja mit ihm einfach noch einmal rückkoppeln."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Tim erwägt, Dirk Textor erneut zu kontaktieren und nach seiner Einschätzung zu fragen.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Dirk Textors Einschätzung|erneut kontaktieren"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Eine erneute Rückkopplung mit Dirk Textor ist möglich.","target":"obs_1","relation":"supports","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"positive","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Rückkopplung mit Dirk Textor|mit ihm"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "d_proposal_with_objection",
|
||||
"description": "Washing possibility and explicit energy disadvantage.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_d",
|
||||
"subject": "Waschen des Materials vor der weiteren Verarbeitung",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Man könnte das Material vor der weiteren Verarbeitung waschen."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Ob sich das lohnt, weiß ich nicht. Waschen heißt nass machen und wieder trocknen; das ist ein wahnsinniger Energieaufwand."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Das Material könnte gewaschen werden.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"vor der weiteren Verarbeitung"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Martin weiß nicht, ob sich das Waschen lohnt.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Nutzen des Waschens|ob es sich lohnt"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Waschen umfasst Nassmachen und erneutes Trocknen.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Waschprozess|Nassmachen und Trocknen"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Waschen und Trocknen verursachen einen sehr hohen Energieaufwand.","target":"obs_1","relation":"opposes","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"negative","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Energieaufwand des Waschens|Waschen und Trocknen"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "e_rejected_alternative",
|
||||
"description": "Explicit rejection followed by confirmation of that rejection.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_e",
|
||||
"subject": "Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer für Versuche",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Das Angebot von Dr. Schlummer für die Versuche kostet 30.000 Euro."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Dann haben wir gesagt: Nein, die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer machen wir nicht."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Antonius: Ja, das ist entschieden."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Das Angebot kostet 30.000 Euro.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Angebot für die Versuche|30.000 Euro"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer wird nicht durchgeführt.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"rejected","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Zusammenarbeit für die Versuche|Dr. Schlummer"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die vorherige Ablehnung ist entschieden.","target":"obs_2","relation":"supports","modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","agreement":"accepted","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"absent"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "f_trial_only_acceptance",
|
||||
"description": "Acceptance limited to a 20-metre trial.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_f",
|
||||
"subject": "20-Prozent-Variante im Versuch am kleinen Extruder",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Wir könnten die 20-Prozent-Variante am kleinen Extruder nachstellen."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Ja, wir testen 20 Meter dieser Variante beim nächsten Versuch."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Tim: Das ist nur ein Versuch; damit ist die Variante noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die 20-Prozent-Variante könnte am kleinen Extruder nachgestellt werden.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"kleiner Extruder"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"20 Meter der Variante werden beim nächsten Versuch getestet.","target":"obs_1","relation":"supports","modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"accepted","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"20 Meter beim nächsten Versuch|20 Meter"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die Zusage gilt nur für einen Versuch.","target":"obs_2","relation":"limits_scope","modality":"factual","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"nur ein Versuch|Versuch"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die Variante ist noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"implicit","scope":"Serienlösung|finale Produktion"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "g_no_decision",
|
||||
"description": "Preference, alternative, and impersonal checking need without decision.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_g",
|
||||
"subject": "Reale Recyclinganlage oder Technikum und verfügbarer Reinigungsansatz",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Eine reale Recyclinganlage hätte das Risiko, dass wir kontaminiertes Material zurückbekommen."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Ich würde nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen. Wenn überhaupt, können wir über ein Technikum reden."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Tim: Man müsste zunächst prüfen, welcher Reinigungsansatz überhaupt verfügbar ist."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Eine reale Recyclinganlage birgt das Risiko kontaminierten Rückmaterials.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"negative","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"reale Recyclinganlage|kontaminiertes Material"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Martin würde nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"opposes","modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"negative","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Martins persönliche Präferenz|reale Anlage"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Ein Technikum bleibt als bedingte Möglichkeit im Gespräch.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"wenn überhaupt|Technikum"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Zunächst muss geprüft werden, welcher Reinigungsansatz verfügbar ist.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"qualifies","modality":"impersonal_necessity","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","scope":"zunächst|verfügbarer Reinigungsansatz"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "h_resulting_action",
|
||||
"description": "Interpersonal request followed by accepted responsibility.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_h",
|
||||
"subject": "Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Nina, übernimmst du die Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag?"},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Nina: Ja, ich übernehme die Prüfung bis Freitag."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Antonius bittet Nina um die Prüfung der Messdaten.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"interpersonal_request","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"named","person":"Nina","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"bis Freitag|Freitag"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Nina übernimmt die Prüfung.","target":"obs_1","relation":"supports","modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"accepted","responsibility":"accepted","person":"Nina","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"bis Freitag|Freitag"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "i_outcome_and_unresolved",
|
||||
"description": "Bounded production finding and unresolved publication information.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_i",
|
||||
"subject": "Produktionsaufwand und Veröffentlichung von Energieaudit-Daten",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: An unserer Anlage gab es bei der reinen Produktion gegenüber dem Standardprodukt praktisch keine Änderung; wir waren nur fünf Grad kälter."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Antonius: Dann können wir mindestens festhalten: Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei der reinen Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig. Davor entsteht natürlich Aufwand."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Antonius: Welche Daten aus dem Energieaudit dürfen wir veröffentlichen?"},
|
||||
{"evidence_id":"e4","text":"Martin: Das ist weiterhin ungeklärt. Wir müssen die Freigabe noch klären."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Bei der reinen Produktion gab es praktisch keine Änderung gegenüber dem Standardprodukt.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"eigene Anlage, reine Produktion, Standardprodukt|reine Produktion"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Produktion erfolgte fünf Grad kälter.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"fünf Grad kälter|5 Grad"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei reiner Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig.","target":"obs_1","relation":"supports","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"accepted","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"reine Produktion gegenüber Virgin Material|Virgin Material"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Vor der reinen Produktion entsteht Aufwand.","target":"obs_3","relation":"limits_scope","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"vor der reinen Produktion|davor"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_5","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Es wird gefragt, welche Energieaudit-Daten veröffentlicht werden dürfen.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"information_question","temporality":"unspecified","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","scope":"Veröffentlichung von Energieaudit-Daten|Energieaudit"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_6","evidence_id":"e4","content":"Die Veröffentlichungserlaubnis ist weiterhin ungeklärt.","target":"obs_5","relation":"supports","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","scope":"Veröffentlichungserlaubnis|Freigabe"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_7","evidence_id":"e4","content":"Die Freigabe muss noch geklärt werden.","target":"obs_5","relation":"supports","modality":"impersonal_necessity","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","scope":"Freigabe zur Veröffentlichung|Freigabe"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cases": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "a_idea_only", "description": "Possible geometry optimization without commitment.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_a", "subject": "Optimierung der Geometrie",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Martin: Die Geometrie kann man vielleicht noch optimieren. Dann würde man mal gucken, was herauskommt."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Geometrie kann vielleicht optimiert werden.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":true,"modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"positive","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":null,"limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Danach könnte betrachtet werden, was herauskommt.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":true,"modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"implicit","qualifier":"danach","limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "b_multiple_options", "description": "Two alternatives for insufficient grid strength.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_b", "subject": "Umgang mit unzureichender Festigkeit des 40-40-Gitters",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Die Festigkeit reicht für das 40-40-Gitter noch nicht aus."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Man könnte mehr Masse für die gleiche Festigkeit einsetzen."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Martin: Oder wir verkaufen es nicht als 40-40-Gitter, sondern machen ein 20-20 daraus. Das wären die zwei Ansätze."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Festigkeit des 40-40-Gitters reicht noch nicht aus.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"negative","affirmation":"absent","negation":"explicit","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"40-40-Gitter","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Mehr Masse könnte für die gleiche Festigkeit eingesetzt werden.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":true,"modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"mehr Masse für die gleiche Festigkeit","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Das Produkt könnte als 20-20 statt 40-40 ausgeführt werden.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"explicit","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"20-20 statt 40-40","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die vorherigen Möglichkeiten sind die zwei Ansätze.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"zwei Ansätze","limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "c_unaccepted_proposal", "description": "Suggested Textor contact without established work.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_c", "subject": "Erneute Kontaktaufnahme mit Dirk Textor zur Einschätzung",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Tim: Ich würde vielleicht Dirk Textor noch einmal kontaktieren und fragen, wie er das einschätzt."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Das kann man ja mit ihm einfach noch einmal rückkoppeln."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Tim erwägt, Dirk Textor erneut zu kontaktieren und nach seiner Einschätzung zu fragen.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Tim","named_person":"Dirk Textor","addressee":null,"self_reference":true,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"erneut; Dirk Textors Einschätzung","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Eine erneute Rückkopplung mit Dirk Textor ist möglich.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Tim","named_person":"Dirk Textor","addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":true,"modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"positive","affirmation":"explicit","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"noch einmal mit ihm","limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "d_proposal_with_objection", "description": "Washing possibility and explicit energy disadvantage.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_d", "subject": "Waschen des Materials vor der weiteren Verarbeitung",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Man könnte das Material vor der weiteren Verarbeitung waschen."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Ob sich das lohnt, weiß ich nicht. Waschen heißt nass machen und wieder trocknen; das ist ein wahnsinniger Energieaufwand."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Das Material könnte gewaschen werden.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Antonius","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":true,"modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"vor der weiteren Verarbeitung","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Martin weiß nicht, ob sich das Waschen lohnt.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":true,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"explicit","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"ob es sich lohnt","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Waschen umfasst Nassmachen und erneutes Trocknen.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"nass machen und wieder trocknen","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Waschen und Trocknen verursachen einen sehr hohen Energieaufwand.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"negative","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"Waschen und Trocknen","limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "e_rejected_alternative", "description": "Explicit negation followed by confirmation of that determination.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_e", "subject": "Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer für Versuche",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Das Angebot von Dr. Schlummer für die Versuche kostet 30.000 Euro."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Dann haben wir gesagt: Nein, die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer machen wir nicht."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Antonius: Ja, das ist entschieden."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Das Angebot von Dr. Schlummer kostet 30.000 Euro.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Antonius","named_person":"Dr. Schlummer","addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"für die Versuche; 30.000 Euro","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer wird nicht durchgeführt.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Tim","named_person":"Dr. Schlummer","addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"explicit","determination_statement":"present","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"Zusammenarbeit für die Versuche","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die vorherige Festlegung ist entschieden.","refers_to":"obs_2","speaker":"Antonius","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"explicit","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"present","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":null,"limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "f_trial_only_acceptance", "description": "Affirmed commitment limited to a 20-metre trial.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_f", "subject": "20-Prozent-Variante im Versuch am kleinen Extruder",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Wir könnten die 20-Prozent-Variante am kleinen Extruder nachstellen."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Ja, wir testen 20 Meter dieser Variante beim nächsten Versuch."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Tim: Das ist nur ein Versuch; damit ist die Variante noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die 20-Prozent-Variante könnte am kleinen Extruder nachgestellt werden.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"am kleinen Extruder","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"20 Meter der Variante werden beim nächsten Versuch getestet.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Tim","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"explicit","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"20 Meter beim nächsten Versuch","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die Zusage gilt nur für einen Versuch.","refers_to":"obs_2","speaker":"Tim","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"nur ein Versuch","limits_target":"obs_2"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die Variante ist noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt.","refers_to":"obs_2","speaker":"Tim","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"explicit","determination_statement":"present","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"implicit","qualifier":"als Serienlösung","limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "g_no_decision", "description": "Preference, alternative, and impersonal checking need without decision.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_g", "subject": "Reale Recyclinganlage oder Technikum und verfügbarer Reinigungsansatz",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Eine reale Recyclinganlage hätte das Risiko, dass wir kontaminiertes Material zurückbekommen."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Ich würde nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen. Wenn überhaupt, können wir über ein Technikum reden."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Tim: Man müsste zunächst prüfen, welcher Reinigungsansatz überhaupt verfügbar ist."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Eine reale Recyclinganlage birgt das Risiko kontaminierten Rückmaterials.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"negative","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"reale Recyclinganlage; kontaminiertes Material","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Martin würde persönlich nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":true,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"negative","affirmation":"absent","negation":"explicit","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"reale Anlage","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Ein Technikum bleibt als bedingte Möglichkeit im Gespräch.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"wenn überhaupt; Technikum","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Zunächst muss geprüft werden, welcher Reinigungsansatz verfügbar ist.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Tim","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":true,"modality":"impersonal_necessity","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","qualifier":"zunächst; verfügbarer Reinigungsansatz","limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "h_resulting_action", "description": "Interpersonal request followed by explicit personal acceptance.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_h", "subject": "Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Nina, übernimmst du die Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag?"},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Nina: Ja, ich übernehme die Prüfung bis Freitag."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Antonius richtet an Nina die Bitte, die Messdaten zu prüfen.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Antonius","named_person":"Nina","addressee":"Nina","self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"interpersonal_request","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"bis Freitag","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Nina sagt zu, die Prüfung zu übernehmen.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Nina","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":true,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"explicit","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"bis Freitag","limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "i_outcome_and_unresolved", "description": "Bounded production finding and unresolved publication information.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_i", "subject": "Produktionsaufwand und Veröffentlichung von Energieaudit-Daten",
|
||||
"evidence": [{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: An unserer Anlage gab es bei der reinen Produktion gegenüber dem Standardprodukt praktisch keine Änderung; wir waren nur fünf Grad kälter."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Antonius: Dann können wir mindestens festhalten: Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei der reinen Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig. Davor entsteht natürlich Aufwand."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Antonius: Welche Daten aus dem Energieaudit dürfen wir veröffentlichen?"},{"evidence_id":"e4","text":"Martin: Das ist weiterhin ungeklärt. Wir müssen die Freigabe noch klären."}],
|
||||
"expected_observations": [
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Bei der reinen Produktion gab es praktisch keine Änderung gegenüber dem Standardprodukt.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"explicit","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"an unserer Anlage; reine Produktion; gegenüber dem Standardprodukt","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Produktion erfolgte fünf Grad kälter.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"fünf Grad kälter","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei reiner Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig.","refers_to":"obs_1","speaker":"Antonius","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"explicit","determination_statement":"present","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"bei reiner Produktion; gegenüber Virgin Material","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Vor der reinen Produktion entsteht Aufwand.","refers_to":"obs_3","speaker":"Antonius","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","qualifier":"davor","limits_target":"obs_3"},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_5","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Es wird gefragt, welche Energieaudit-Daten veröffentlicht werden dürfen.","refers_to":null,"speaker":"Antonius","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"information_question","temporality":"unspecified","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","qualifier":"Veröffentlichung von Energieaudit-Daten","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_6","evidence_id":"e4","content":"Die Veröffentlichungserlaubnis ist weiterhin ungeklärt.","refers_to":"obs_5","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":false,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","qualifier":"weiterhin","limits_target":null},
|
||||
{"observation_id":"obs_7","evidence_id":"e4","content":"Die Freigabe muss noch geklärt werden.","refers_to":"obs_5","speaker":"Martin","named_person":null,"addressee":null,"self_reference":false,"collective_we":true,"impersonal_person_reference":false,"modality":"impersonal_necessity","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","affirmation":"absent","negation":"absent","determination_statement":"absent","uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","qualifier":"noch; Freigabe zur Veröffentlichung","limits_target":null}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cases": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"a_idea_only","description":"Possible geometry optimization without commitment.","subject_id":"subject_a","subject":"Optimierung der Geometrie",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Die Geometrie kann man vielleicht noch optimieren. Dann würde man mal gucken, was herauskommt."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["Geometry optimization remains possible and tentative.","Subsequent checking remains conditional and tentative.","The then/sequential dependency survives.","No commitment or owner is introduced."]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"b_multiple_options","description":"Two alternatives for insufficient grid strength.","subject_id":"subject_b","subject":"Umgang mit unzureichender Festigkeit des 40-40-Gitters",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Die Festigkeit reicht für das 40-40-Gitter noch nicht aus."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Man könnte mehr Masse für die gleiche Festigkeit einsetzen."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Martin: Oder wir verkaufen es nicht als 40-40-Gitter, sondern machen ein 20-20 daraus. Das wären die zwei Ansätze."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["Insufficient 40-40 strength survives.","Additional mass remains one alternative.","20-20 remains another alternative.","Both remain alternatives and neither is selected."]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"c_unaccepted_proposal","description":"Suggested Textor contact without established work.","subject_id":"subject_c","subject":"Erneute Kontaktaufnahme mit Dirk Textor zur Einschätzung",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Tim: Ich würde vielleicht Dirk Textor noch einmal kontaktieren und fragen, wie er das einschätzt."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Das kann man ja mit ihm einfach noch einmal rückkoppeln."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["Contacting Dirk Textor remains Tim's tentative personal suggestion.","The follow-up remains possible and relates to that contact.","No established work or responsibility is introduced."]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"d_proposal_with_objection","description":"Washing possibility and explicit energy disadvantage.","subject_id":"subject_d","subject":"Waschen des Materials vor der weiteren Verarbeitung",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Man könnte das Material vor der weiteren Verarbeitung waschen."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Ob sich das lohnt, weiß ich nicht. Waschen heißt nass machen und wieder trocknen; das ist ein wahnsinniger Energieaufwand."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["Washing before further processing remains possible.","Martin's uncertainty whether washing is worthwhile survives.","The washing and drying process survives.","The high energy consequence survives.","No unresolved task is invented."]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"e_rejected_alternative","description":"Explicit rejection followed by confirmation of that determination.","subject_id":"subject_e","subject":"Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer für Versuche",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Das Angebot von Dr. Schlummer für die Versuche kostet 30.000 Euro."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Dann haben wir gesagt: Nein, die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer machen wir nicht."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Antonius: Ja, das ist entschieden."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["The offer cost survives without inferred evaluation.","Collaboration is explicitly not to be pursued.","The explicit rejection survives.","The later statement confirms that the preceding determination has been made."]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"f_trial_only_acceptance","description":"Collective commitment limited to a 20-metre trial.","subject_id":"subject_f","subject":"20-Prozent-Variante im Versuch am kleinen Extruder",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Wir könnten die 20-Prozent-Variante am kleinen Extruder nachstellen."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Ja, wir testen 20 Meter dieser Variante beim nächsten Versuch."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Tim: Das ist nur ein Versuch; damit ist die Variante noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["The 20-percent variant at the small extruder remains initially possible.","The later statement collectively commits to a test.","Twenty metres and next-trial timing survive.","The test remains limited to a trial.","Series adoption remains explicitly not yet established.","No individual owner is invented."]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"g_no_decision","description":"Preference, conditional alternative, and impersonal checking need.","subject_id":"subject_g","subject":"Reale Recyclinganlage oder Technikum und verfügbarer Reinigungsansatz",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Eine reale Recyclinganlage hätte das Risiko, dass wir kontaminiertes Material zurückbekommen."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Ich würde nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen. Wenn überhaupt, können wir über ein Technikum reden."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Tim: Man müsste zunächst prüfen, welcher Reinigungsansatz überhaupt verfügbar ist."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["Contamination remains a risk rather than a fact.","Martin's negative stance remains personal.","The Technikum remains conditional and if-at-all survives.","Cleaning-method availability still needs to be checked.","The need remains impersonal.","No group decision or owner is invented."]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"h_resulting_action","description":"Interpersonal request followed by explicit personal acceptance.","subject_id":"subject_h","subject":"Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Nina, übernimmst du die Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag?"},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Nina: Ja, ich übernehme die Prüfung bis Freitag."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["Antonius requests measurement-data review from Nina.","The Friday deadline survives.","Nina explicitly accepts the preceding request.","Nina's response expresses future personal commitment.","No responsibility field or unsupported inference is introduced."]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id":"i_outcome_and_unresolved","description":"Bounded production finding and unresolved publication information.","subject_id":"subject_i","subject":"Produktionsaufwand und Veröffentlichung von Energieaudit-Daten",
|
||||
"evidence":[{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: An unserer Anlage gab es bei der reinen Produktion gegenüber dem Standardprodukt praktisch keine Änderung; wir waren nur fünf Grad kälter."},{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Antonius: Dann können wir mindestens festhalten: Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei der reinen Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig. Davor entsteht natürlich Aufwand."},{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Antonius: Welche Daten aus dem Energieaudit dürfen wir veröffentlichen?"},{"evidence_id":"e4","text":"Martin: Das ist weiterhin ungeklärt. Wir müssen die Freigabe noch klären."}],
|
||||
"semantic_requirements":["The pure-production finding remains bounded to the local plant and standard-product comparison.","The five-degree difference survives.","No-extra-effort remains bounded to pure production compared with Virgin material.","Upstream effort before that production stage survives.","The publication purpose of the energy-audit question remains explicit.","Publication permission remains unresolved and clarification remains necessary.","No assigned work is invented."]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
# semantic_synthesis_isolation
|
||||
|
||||
Isolation Gold set derived from the existing Topic Reconstruction V2 A-I
|
||||
cases. Every case supplies one manually fixed Discussion Subject and the
|
||||
complete original evidence bundle. The model performs Semantic Synthesis only;
|
||||
subject detection, subject grouping, and evidence assignment are outside the
|
||||
experiment.
|
||||
|
||||
Expected criteria evaluate semantic event distinctions, outcomes and scope,
|
||||
actions, unresolved issues, and supporting evidence. They do not evaluate
|
||||
subject discovery or exact wording.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cases": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "a_idea_only",
|
||||
"description": "Idea mentioned without stronger commitment.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_a",
|
||||
"subject": "Optimierung der Geometrie",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Martin: Die Geometrie kann man vielleicht noch optimieren. Dann würde man mal gucken, was herauskommt."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": [],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {"idea": 1},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["idea"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": ["e1"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"count": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {"count": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "b_multiple_options",
|
||||
"description": "Two alternatives for insufficient 40-40 grid strength.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_b",
|
||||
"subject": "Umgang mit unzureichender Festigkeit des 40-40-Gitters",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Martin: Die Festigkeit reicht für das 40-40-Gitter noch nicht aus."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e2", "text": "Martin: Man könnte mehr Masse für die gleiche Festigkeit einsetzen."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e3", "text": "Martin: Oder wir verkaufen es nicht als 40-40-Gitter, sondern machen ein 20-20 daraus. Das wären die zwei Ansätze."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": [],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {"option": 2},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["technical_finding", "fact", "option"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": ["e1", "e2", "e3"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"count": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {"count": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "c_unaccepted_proposal",
|
||||
"description": "Possible Textor contact remains a proposal only.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_c",
|
||||
"subject": "Erneute Kontaktaufnahme mit Dirk Textor zur Einschätzung",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Tim: Ich würde vielleicht Dirk Textor noch einmal kontaktieren und fragen, wie er das einschätzt."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e2", "text": "Tim: Das kann man ja mit ihm einfach noch einmal rückkoppeln."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": [],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {"proposal": 1},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["proposal"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": ["e1", "e2"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"count": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {"count": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "d_proposal_with_objection",
|
||||
"description": "Washing proposal with energy objection but no unresolved issue.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_d",
|
||||
"subject": "Waschen des Materials vor der weiteren Verarbeitung",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Antonius: Man könnte das Material vor der weiteren Verarbeitung waschen."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e2", "text": "Martin: Ob sich das lohnt, weiß ich nicht. Waschen heißt nass machen und wieder trocknen; das ist ein wahnsinniger Energieaufwand."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": [],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {"proposal": 1, "objection": 1},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["proposal", "objection"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": ["e1", "e2"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"count": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {"count": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "e_rejected_alternative",
|
||||
"description": "Explicit rejection of Schlummer collaboration.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_e",
|
||||
"subject": "Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer für Versuche",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Antonius: Das Angebot von Dr. Schlummer für die Versuche kostet 30.000 Euro."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e2", "text": "Tim: Dann haben wir gesagt: Nein, die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer machen wir nicht."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e3", "text": "Antonius: Ja, das ist entschieden."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": [],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {"fact": 1, "rejection": 1},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["fact", "rejection", "clarification"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": ["e1", "e2", "e3"],
|
||||
"outcome": {
|
||||
"required": true,
|
||||
"statuses": ["rejected"],
|
||||
"terms": ["nicht", "abgelehnt", "keine"],
|
||||
"scope_terms": ["zusammenarbeit", "versuch", "schlummer"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e2", "e3"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {"count": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {"count": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "f_trial_only_acceptance",
|
||||
"description": "Acceptance limited to a 20-metre trial.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_f",
|
||||
"subject": "20-Prozent-Variante im Versuch am kleinen Extruder",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Martin: Wir könnten die 20-Prozent-Variante am kleinen Extruder nachstellen."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e2", "text": "Tim: Ja, wir testen 20 Meter dieser Variante beim nächsten Versuch."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e3", "text": "Tim: Das ist nur ein Versuch; damit ist die Variante noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": [],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {"proposal": 1, "scoped_acceptance": 1, "clarification": 1},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["proposal", "scoped_acceptance", "clarification"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": ["e1", "e2", "e3"],
|
||||
"outcome": {
|
||||
"required": true,
|
||||
"statuses": ["scoped_acceptance"],
|
||||
"terms": ["test", "versuch"],
|
||||
"scope_terms": ["20 meter", "20 m", "nur", "begrenzt"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e2", "e3"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {
|
||||
"count": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["test", "versuch", "20 meter"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e2"],
|
||||
"due_terms": ["nächsten versuch", "next trial"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {
|
||||
"count": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["serienlösung", "final", "serie", "festgelegt"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e3"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "g_no_decision",
|
||||
"description": "Plant versus Technikum discussion ending without a decision.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_g",
|
||||
"subject": "Reale Recyclinganlage oder Technikum und verfügbarer Reinigungsansatz",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Martin: Eine reale Recyclinganlage hätte das Risiko, dass wir kontaminiertes Material zurückbekommen."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e2", "text": "Martin: Ich würde nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen. Wenn überhaupt, können wir über ein Technikum reden."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e3", "text": "Tim: Man müsste zunächst prüfen, welcher Reinigungsansatz überhaupt verfügbar ist."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": [],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {"objection": 1, "option": 1},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["objection", "option", "proposal", "clarification"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": ["e1", "e2", "e3"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"count": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {
|
||||
"count": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["reinigungsansatz", "verfügbar", "prüfen", "reinigung"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e3"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "h_resulting_action",
|
||||
"description": "Explicitly accepted action with owner and deadline.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_h",
|
||||
"subject": "Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Antonius: Nina, übernimmst du die Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag?"},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e2", "text": "Nina: Ja, ich übernehme die Prüfung bis Freitag."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": ["Nina"],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["proposal", "clarification", "scoped_acceptance"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": [],
|
||||
"outcome": {
|
||||
"required": true,
|
||||
"statuses": ["established"],
|
||||
"terms": ["übernimmt", "prüf", "accepted", "review", "assigned"],
|
||||
"scope_terms": ["messdaten", "prüfung", "measurement", "review"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e2"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {
|
||||
"count": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["messdaten", "prüf", "measurement", "review"],
|
||||
"responsible": "Nina",
|
||||
"due_terms": ["freitag", "friday"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e2"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {"count": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "i_outcome_and_unresolved",
|
||||
"description": "Bounded production outcome and unresolved publication question.",
|
||||
"subject_id": "subject_i",
|
||||
"subject": "Produktionsaufwand und Veröffentlichung von Energieaudit-Daten",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Martin: An unserer Anlage gab es bei der reinen Produktion gegenüber dem Standardprodukt praktisch keine Änderung; wir waren nur fünf Grad kälter."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e2", "text": "Antonius: Dann können wir mindestens festhalten: Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei der reinen Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig. Davor entsteht natürlich Aufwand."},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e3", "text": "Antonius: Welche Daten aus dem Energieaudit dürfen wir veröffentlichen?"},
|
||||
{"evidence_id": "e4", "text": "Martin: Das ist weiterhin ungeklärt. Wir müssen die Freigabe noch klären."}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"allowed_responsible": [],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"event_type_minimums": {"fact": 1},
|
||||
"allowed_event_types": ["technical_finding", "fact", "clarification"],
|
||||
"event_evidence_ids": ["e1", "e2"],
|
||||
"outcome": {
|
||||
"required": true,
|
||||
"statuses": ["established"],
|
||||
"terms": ["kein zusätzlicher", "keine zusätzliche", "unverändert"],
|
||||
"scope_terms": ["reine produktion", "produktion", "virgin"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e1", "e2"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {"count": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved_issues": {
|
||||
"count": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["veröffentlich", "freigabe", "energieaudit", "daten"],
|
||||
"evidence_ids": ["e3", "e4"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
# topic_reconstruction_v2
|
||||
|
||||
Focused experimental Gold material derived from BUG-015 and the Progeo
|
||||
discussion. These cases evaluate topic-oriented reconstruction rather than
|
||||
exact protocol wording or flat category extraction.
|
||||
|
||||
The nine cases cover:
|
||||
|
||||
- an idea mentioned without further development;
|
||||
- multiple alternatives;
|
||||
- an unaccepted proposal;
|
||||
- a proposal with an objection;
|
||||
- an explicitly rejected alternative;
|
||||
- acceptance limited to a bounded trial;
|
||||
- discussion ending without a decision;
|
||||
- a resulting Action Item;
|
||||
- an outcome accompanied by an unresolved issue.
|
||||
|
||||
Evidence units carry stable local IDs. Expected criteria describe semantic
|
||||
features and prohibited promotions rather than exact generated sentences.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cases": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "a_idea_only",
|
||||
"description": "A geometry optimization idea is mentioned but not developed.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Die Geometrie kann man vielleicht noch optimieren. Dann würde man mal gucken, was herauskommt."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["geometr"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": ["introduced_idea"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"minimum": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved": {"minimum": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "b_multiple_options",
|
||||
"description": "Two alternatives for compensating insufficient specimen strength are discussed.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Die Festigkeit reicht für das 40-40-Gitter noch nicht aus."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e2",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Man könnte mehr Masse für die gleiche Festigkeit einsetzen."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e3",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Oder wir verkaufen es nicht als 40-40-Gitter, sondern machen ein 20-20 daraus. Das wären die zwei Ansätze."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["festigkeit", "gitter", "geometr"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": ["considered_option"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"minimum": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved": {"minimum": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "c_unaccepted_proposal",
|
||||
"description": "Contacting Dirk Textor is proposed but not accepted as work.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Tim: Ich würde vielleicht Dirk Textor noch einmal kontaktieren und fragen, wie er das einschätzt."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e2",
|
||||
"text": "Tim: Das kann man ja mit ihm einfach noch einmal rückkoppeln."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["textor", "einschätzung", "kontakt"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": ["proposal"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"minimum": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved": {"minimum": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "d_proposal_with_objection",
|
||||
"description": "Washing is considered and an energy-cost objection is raised.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Antonius: Man könnte das Material vor der weiteren Verarbeitung waschen."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e2",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Ob sich das lohnt, weiß ich nicht. Waschen heißt nass machen und wieder trocknen; das ist ein wahnsinniger Energieaufwand."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["wasch", "reinig"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": ["proposal", "objection"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"minimum": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved": {"minimum": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "e_rejected_alternative",
|
||||
"description": "The collaboration with Dr. Schlummer is explicitly rejected after its cost is discussed.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Antonius: Das Angebot von Dr. Schlummer für die Versuche kostet 30.000 Euro."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e2",
|
||||
"text": "Tim: Dann haben wir gesagt: Nein, die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer machen wir nicht."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e3",
|
||||
"text": "Antonius: Ja, das ist entschieden."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["schlummer", "zusammenarbeit"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": ["fact"],
|
||||
"outcome": {
|
||||
"required": true,
|
||||
"terms": ["nicht", "abgelehnt", "keine"],
|
||||
"scope_terms": ["zusammenarbeit", "versuch"],
|
||||
"certainties": ["rejected", "established"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {"minimum": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved": {"minimum": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "f_trial_only_acceptance",
|
||||
"description": "A 20 percent variant is accepted only for a bounded trial, not as the final production solution.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Wir könnten die 20-Prozent-Variante am kleinen Extruder nachstellen."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e2",
|
||||
"text": "Tim: Ja, wir testen 20 Meter dieser Variante beim nächsten Versuch."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e3",
|
||||
"text": "Tim: Das ist nur ein Versuch; damit ist die Variante noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["20-prozent", "variante", "extruder"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": ["proposal", "clarification"],
|
||||
"outcome": {
|
||||
"required": true,
|
||||
"terms": ["test", "versuch"],
|
||||
"scope_terms": ["20 meter", "20 m", "nur", "begrenzt"],
|
||||
"certainties": ["established", "conditional"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["test", "versuch", "20 meters", "20 meter"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unresolved": {
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["final", "series", "serie", "adopt", "festgelegt"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "g_no_decision",
|
||||
"description": "Real recycling plant and Technikum alternatives are discussed without a group decision.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Eine reale Recyclinganlage hätte das Risiko, dass wir kontaminiertes Material zurückbekommen."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e2",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Ich würde nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen. Wenn überhaupt, können wir über ein Technikum reden."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e3",
|
||||
"text": "Tim: Man müsste zunächst prüfen, welcher Reinigungsansatz überhaupt verfügbar ist."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["technikum", "reinig", "anlage"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": ["considered_option", "objection"],
|
||||
"outcome": {"required": false},
|
||||
"actions": {"minimum": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved": {
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["reinigungsansatz", "verfügbar", "anlage", "prüfen"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "h_resulting_action",
|
||||
"description": "The discussion establishes an accepted review action with owner and deadline.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Antonius: Nina, übernimmst du die Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag?"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e2",
|
||||
"text": "Nina: Ja, ich übernehme die Prüfung bis Freitag."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["messdaten", "prüfung", "prüfen", "verification", "data"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": [],
|
||||
"outcome": {
|
||||
"required": true,
|
||||
"terms": ["agrees", "übernimmt", "accepted", "verify"],
|
||||
"scope_terms": ["measurement", "messdaten", "verification"],
|
||||
"certainties": ["established"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["messdaten", "prüf", "verify", "measurement"],
|
||||
"responsible": "Nina"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"unresolved": {"minimum": 0}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"case_id": "i_outcome_and_unresolved",
|
||||
"description": "The production-energy discussion establishes one bounded finding while publication remains unresolved.",
|
||||
"evidence_units": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e1",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: An unserer Anlage gab es bei der reinen Produktion gegenüber dem Standardprodukt praktisch keine Änderung; wir waren nur fünf Grad kälter."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e2",
|
||||
"text": "Antonius: Dann können wir mindestens festhalten: Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei der reinen Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig. Davor entsteht natürlich Aufwand."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e3",
|
||||
"text": "Antonius: Welche Daten aus dem Energieaudit dürfen wir veröffentlichen?"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"evidence_id": "e4",
|
||||
"text": "Martin: Das ist weiterhin ungeklärt. Wir müssen die Freigabe noch klären."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"expected": {
|
||||
"subject_count": 1,
|
||||
"subject_terms": ["energie", "aufwand", "produktion"],
|
||||
"required_event_types": ["technical_finding"],
|
||||
"outcome": {
|
||||
"required": true,
|
||||
"terms": ["kein zusätzlicher", "keine zusätzliche", "unverändert"],
|
||||
"scope_terms": ["reine produktion", "produktion", "gegenüber virgin"],
|
||||
"certainties": ["established"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"actions": {"minimum": 0},
|
||||
"unresolved": {
|
||||
"minimum": 1,
|
||||
"terms": ["veröffentlich", "freigabe", "energieaudit", "daten"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user