Enforce explicit responsibility attribution

- document responsibility attribution as a project-wide invariant
- prevent inferred ownership in protocol rendering
- add negative gold regression for false responsibility assignment
- document future responsibility evidence and attribution model
- record the real-life benchmark finding
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-31 13:01:11 +02:00
parent 40f390ebfe
commit 63075eaca9
13 changed files with 359 additions and 0 deletions
+18
View File
@@ -70,6 +70,24 @@ Status:
of the source transcript or consolidated meeting knowledge unless an explicit
output language is requested.
## Responsibility Attribution Invariant
A person, team or department may be recorded as responsible only when the
meeting evidence explicitly assigns, accepts or confirms that responsibility.
Discussion, expertise, objection, suggestion, thematic proximity, speaker
adjacency, organizational assumptions, likely job roles or mere mention do not
establish ownership.
When support is incomplete or ambiguous, leave the responsible person unset,
mark the item as unclear where the current schema supports it, and preserve the
supporting evidence. Never guess.
This invariant applies to extraction, canonicalization, semantic consolidation,
Canonical Meeting Knowledge, Working Protocol / Arbeitsprotokoll, Distribution
Protocol / Verteilerprotokoll and Knowledge Objects /
Wissensdatenbankeintrag.
## Prompt Engineering Rules
The Gold Standard corpus is the reference specification. Follow Rules 1-11 from