Enforce explicit responsibility attribution
- document responsibility attribution as a project-wide invariant - prevent inferred ownership in protocol rendering - add negative gold regression for false responsibility assignment - document future responsibility evidence and attribution model - record the real-life benchmark finding
This commit is contained in:
@@ -70,6 +70,24 @@ Status:
|
||||
of the source transcript or consolidated meeting knowledge unless an explicit
|
||||
output language is requested.
|
||||
|
||||
## Responsibility Attribution Invariant
|
||||
|
||||
A person, team or department may be recorded as responsible only when the
|
||||
meeting evidence explicitly assigns, accepts or confirms that responsibility.
|
||||
|
||||
Discussion, expertise, objection, suggestion, thematic proximity, speaker
|
||||
adjacency, organizational assumptions, likely job roles or mere mention do not
|
||||
establish ownership.
|
||||
|
||||
When support is incomplete or ambiguous, leave the responsible person unset,
|
||||
mark the item as unclear where the current schema supports it, and preserve the
|
||||
supporting evidence. Never guess.
|
||||
|
||||
This invariant applies to extraction, canonicalization, semantic consolidation,
|
||||
Canonical Meeting Knowledge, Working Protocol / Arbeitsprotokoll, Distribution
|
||||
Protocol / Verteilerprotokoll and Knowledge Objects /
|
||||
Wissensdatenbankeintrag.
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt Engineering Rules
|
||||
|
||||
The Gold Standard corpus is the reference specification. Follow Rules 1-11 from
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user