Enforce explicit responsibility attribution
- document responsibility attribution as a project-wide invariant - prevent inferred ownership in protocol rendering - add negative gold regression for false responsibility assignment - document future responsibility evidence and attribution model - record the real-life benchmark finding
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
# responsibility_attribution_negative
|
||||
|
||||
Tests that thematic proximity, department discussion and objection do not create
|
||||
an action-item owner.
|
||||
|
||||
The scenario includes a Marketing participant who comments critically on
|
||||
Business Development criteria. No one assigns that participant responsibility
|
||||
for defining the criteria, and the participant does not accept such a task.
|
||||
|
||||
Expected behavior:
|
||||
|
||||
- Do not assign Business Development criteria to the Marketing participant.
|
||||
- Do not reclassify the Marketing participant as Business Development.
|
||||
- Preserve the objection as a position.
|
||||
- Keep responsibility open unless explicitly assigned.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user