Establish prompt engineering baseline with Gold Standard tests
- introduce Gold Standard evaluation corpus - document decision taxonomy - define prompt-engineering methodology - add regression workflow - establish Prompt Version 2 baseline - validate decision_simple, decision_deferred and decision_none
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
||||
# evil_meeting
|
||||
|
||||
Tests a deliberately difficult meeting with interruptions, corrections, topic switches, changed positions, absent referenced people, and near-decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
Every utterance is designed to trigger a common extraction failure. The meeting mentions Omar and Platform, but neither is a participant. It includes an explicit non-decision on migration and a real decision only on excluding FR-7 from Friday's batch.
|
||||
|
||||
Typical LLM mistakes:
|
||||
|
||||
- Extracting a migration decision even though the group says no migration decision today.
|
||||
- Assigning Dana a todo even though she retracts it.
|
||||
- Treating Omar as a participant or technical owner.
|
||||
- Claiming Platform approved something despite being absent.
|
||||
- Losing the correction from "old export" to "nightly CSV job" and from API export to CSV export.
|
||||
- Treating Dana's opinion about rollout appearance as a fact or decision.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user