admin
9446c6e0be
- document Entity Registry and Meeting Context V2 architecture - preserve meeting_context.yaml as the authoritative meeting-specific input - define immutable authoritative metadata across all pipeline stages - restrict Constraint Repair to deterministic structured-data operations - record BUG-003 root cause and deferred entity-verification resolution - document BUG-005 attendance-consistency design - add BUG-006 renderer faithfulness root-cause analysis - distinguish Engineering Readiness from Practical Usability - update the persistent regression bug tracker
1.9 KiB
Quality Readiness
Meeting Lab quality status should distinguish engineering readiness from practical usability.
Engineering Readiness
Status: NOT READY
The current end-to-end pipeline is not ready to replace the previous extraction pipeline. The latest quality milestone records seven known regression bugs, two documented root-cause investigations and a renderer faithfulness failure where consolidated items are omitted or reclassified.
Engineering readiness requires at least:
- faithful rendering of consolidated decisions, action items and open questions
- no false responsibility attribution
- no participant-attendance contradictions against Meeting Context
- no unverified person/entity names entering final protocols unchecked
- regression tests or validation coverage for fixed bugs
Practical Usability
Status: READY FOR MANUAL EDIT
The generated working protocol can still be useful as a draft when reviewed by a human editor against the known meeting content. This status does not imply engineering readiness and must not be used as evidence that the pipeline is faithful or production-ready.
Practical usability means:
- the broad meeting structure is recognizable
- many relevant topics and process points are present
- manual correction is still required before the protocol can be trusted
Known manual correction areas include:
- false or over-strong responsibility attribution
- incorrect open questions
- synthetic or unverified names from transcript artifacts
- participant-attendance contradictions
- reversed or over-broad process meaning
Current Benchmark Reference
Latest benchmark reviewed for this distinction:
samples/benchmarks/meeting_context_v1/e2e_current_20260803_151000/benchmark_report.md
The benchmark report concludes NOT READY for engineering replacement. This
document adds the separate practical-usability classification for manual-edit
workflows only.