meeting-lab/samples/real_live/vanheede_naue_recycled_hdpe_2026-09-14/evaluation.md

Regression expectations

The exact prompts and compact diarized protocol input are the evaluation evidence. Test semantic fidelity and grounded attribution; do not require a byte-identical protocol or treat editorial concision as an extraction error.

ID	Expectation
R1	The resulting protocol is clearly English.
R2	The substantive discussion remains usable despite non-native English speech and the transcription imperfections visible in the evidence.
R3	The four diarized clusters are not casually collapsed or conflated.
R4	With the generation-002 mappings, Christian Psiorz, Martin Tazl, Dries Nollet, and Jorik Muylle remain attached to their explicit clusters.
R5	An unmapped cluster may be named only where the transcript gives positive, unique conversational evidence. Generation 001 supplies strong evidence for Martin, Christian, and Dries.
R6	The participant list alone must not justify a name assignment. In generation 001, the SPEAKER_00 → Jorik Muylle assignment is not sufficiently explained by persisted evidence.
R7	Where the evidence is not unique, retain anonymity or state uncertainty; do not manufacture a person identity.
R8	Identity resolution must not turn an idea, question, offer, or reference into a personal responsibility. In particular, conditions around lab testing and discussion with polymer partners must retain their stated scope.
R9	Preserve the material technical, regulatory, commercial, and tender context: regulatory limits on external recycled content; durability/testing constraints; technical purity/process discussion; potential certified hybrid materials; and the stated tender follow-up.
R10	A human’s later editorial choice to omit information is distinct from a factual extraction error. No persisted human-edited protocol exists in this case, so this is a review rule rather than a textual golden answer.

Attribution-sensitive checks

• SPEAKER_03 says that the tender will be sent; the generation-002 mapping supports Dries Nollet as the speaker. Verify the wording does not expand this to unrelated ownership.
• Martin offers lab-scale tests if Vanheede provides material; preserve the conditional offer rather than a committed unconditional task.
• The discussion says Jorik/Vanheede will discuss requirements with polymer partners in context, but a responsible person must be recorded only where the source explicitly assigns or accepts it.
• The protocol must distinguish current constraints from forecasts about EU standards and market changes.

Reference outputs

protocol_generation/002/protocol.md is the primary mapped-speaker reference. protocol_generation/001/protocol.md is intentionally retained as a cautionary unmapped comparison: it is useful for content review, but its name attribution cannot be used as a target wherever the transcript does not support it.