Record the V1-V3 experiments and accept the minimal semantic-preservation first stage.
148 lines
18 KiB
JSON
148 lines
18 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"cases": [
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "a_idea_only",
|
|
"description": "Possible geometry optimization without commitment.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_a",
|
|
"subject": "Optimierung der Geometrie",
|
|
"evidence": [{"evidence_id": "e1", "text": "Martin: Die Geometrie kann man vielleicht noch optimieren. Dann würde man mal gucken, was herauskommt."}],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Geometrie kann vielleicht optimiert werden.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"positive","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"absent"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Danach könnte betrachtet werden, was herauskommt.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"implicit","scope":"nach der Optimierung|danach"}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "b_multiple_options",
|
|
"description": "Two alternatives for insufficient grid strength.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_b",
|
|
"subject": "Umgang mit unzureichender Festigkeit des 40-40-Gitters",
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Die Festigkeit reicht für das 40-40-Gitter noch nicht aus."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Man könnte mehr Masse für die gleiche Festigkeit einsetzen."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Martin: Oder wir verkaufen es nicht als 40-40-Gitter, sondern machen ein 20-20 daraus. Das wären die zwei Ansätze."}
|
|
],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Festigkeit reicht noch nicht aus.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"negative","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"40-40-Gitter|40-40"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Mehr Masse könnte für die gleiche Festigkeit eingesetzt werden.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"mehr Masse|gleiche Festigkeit"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Das Produkt könnte als 20-20 statt 40-40 ausgeführt werden.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"20-20|statt 40-40"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die vorherigen Möglichkeiten sind die zwei Ansätze.","target":["obs_2","obs_3"],"relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"absent"}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "c_unaccepted_proposal",
|
|
"description": "Suggested Textor contact without established work.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_c",
|
|
"subject": "Erneute Kontaktaufnahme mit Dirk Textor zur Einschätzung",
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Tim: Ich würde vielleicht Dirk Textor noch einmal kontaktieren und fragen, wie er das einschätzt."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Das kann man ja mit ihm einfach noch einmal rückkoppeln."}
|
|
],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Tim erwägt, Dirk Textor erneut zu kontaktieren und nach seiner Einschätzung zu fragen.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Dirk Textors Einschätzung|erneut kontaktieren"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Eine erneute Rückkopplung mit Dirk Textor ist möglich.","target":"obs_1","relation":"supports","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"positive","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Rückkopplung mit Dirk Textor|mit ihm"}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "d_proposal_with_objection",
|
|
"description": "Washing possibility and explicit energy disadvantage.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_d",
|
|
"subject": "Waschen des Materials vor der weiteren Verarbeitung",
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Man könnte das Material vor der weiteren Verarbeitung waschen."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Ob sich das lohnt, weiß ich nicht. Waschen heißt nass machen und wieder trocknen; das ist ein wahnsinniger Energieaufwand."}
|
|
],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Das Material könnte gewaschen werden.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"vor der weiteren Verarbeitung"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Martin weiß nicht, ob sich das Waschen lohnt.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Nutzen des Waschens|ob es sich lohnt"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Waschen umfasst Nassmachen und erneutes Trocknen.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Waschprozess|Nassmachen und Trocknen"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Waschen und Trocknen verursachen einen sehr hohen Energieaufwand.","target":"obs_1","relation":"opposes","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"negative","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Energieaufwand des Waschens|Waschen und Trocknen"}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "e_rejected_alternative",
|
|
"description": "Explicit rejection followed by confirmation of that rejection.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_e",
|
|
"subject": "Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer für Versuche",
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Das Angebot von Dr. Schlummer für die Versuche kostet 30.000 Euro."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Dann haben wir gesagt: Nein, die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer machen wir nicht."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Antonius: Ja, das ist entschieden."}
|
|
],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Das Angebot kostet 30.000 Euro.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Angebot für die Versuche|30.000 Euro"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Die Zusammenarbeit mit Dr. Schlummer wird nicht durchgeführt.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"rejected","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Zusammenarbeit für die Versuche|Dr. Schlummer"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die vorherige Ablehnung ist entschieden.","target":"obs_2","relation":"supports","modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","agreement":"accepted","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"absent"}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "f_trial_only_acceptance",
|
|
"description": "Acceptance limited to a 20-metre trial.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_f",
|
|
"subject": "20-Prozent-Variante im Versuch am kleinen Extruder",
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Wir könnten die 20-Prozent-Variante am kleinen Extruder nachstellen."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Tim: Ja, wir testen 20 Meter dieser Variante beim nächsten Versuch."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Tim: Das ist nur ein Versuch; damit ist die Variante noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt."}
|
|
],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die 20-Prozent-Variante könnte am kleinen Extruder nachgestellt werden.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"kleiner Extruder"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"20 Meter der Variante werden beim nächsten Versuch getestet.","target":"obs_1","relation":"supports","modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"accepted","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"20 Meter beim nächsten Versuch|20 Meter"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die Zusage gilt nur für einen Versuch.","target":"obs_2","relation":"limits_scope","modality":"factual","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"nur ein Versuch|Versuch"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Die Variante ist noch nicht als Serienlösung festgelegt.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"implicit","scope":"Serienlösung|finale Produktion"}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "g_no_decision",
|
|
"description": "Preference, alternative, and impersonal checking need without decision.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_g",
|
|
"subject": "Reale Recyclinganlage oder Technikum und verfügbarer Reinigungsansatz",
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: Eine reale Recyclinganlage hätte das Risiko, dass wir kontaminiertes Material zurückbekommen."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Martin: Ich würde nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen. Wenn überhaupt, können wir über ein Technikum reden."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Tim: Man müsste zunächst prüfen, welcher Reinigungsansatz überhaupt verfügbar ist."}
|
|
],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Eine reale Recyclinganlage birgt das Risiko kontaminierten Rückmaterials.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"negative","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"reale Recyclinganlage|kontaminiertes Material"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Martin würde nicht in eine reale Anlage gehen.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"opposes","modality":"suggested","temporality":"future","evaluation":"negative","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"Martins persönliche Präferenz|reale Anlage"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Ein Technikum bleibt als bedingte Möglichkeit im Gespräch.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"possible","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"none","scope":"wenn überhaupt|Technikum"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Zunächst muss geprüft werden, welcher Reinigungsansatz verfügbar ist.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"qualifies","modality":"impersonal_necessity","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","scope":"zunächst|verfügbarer Reinigungsansatz"}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "h_resulting_action",
|
|
"description": "Interpersonal request followed by accepted responsibility.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_h",
|
|
"subject": "Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag",
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Antonius: Nina, übernimmst du die Prüfung der Messdaten bis Freitag?"},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Nina: Ja, ich übernehme die Prüfung bis Freitag."}
|
|
],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Antonius bittet Nina um die Prüfung der Messdaten.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"interpersonal_request","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"named","person":"Nina","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"bis Freitag|Freitag"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Nina übernimmt die Prüfung.","target":"obs_1","relation":"supports","modality":"committed","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"accepted","responsibility":"accepted","person":"Nina","uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"bis Freitag|Freitag"}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"case_id": "i_outcome_and_unresolved",
|
|
"description": "Bounded production finding and unresolved publication information.",
|
|
"subject_id": "subject_i",
|
|
"subject": "Produktionsaufwand und Veröffentlichung von Energieaudit-Daten",
|
|
"evidence": [
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e1","text":"Martin: An unserer Anlage gab es bei der reinen Produktion gegenüber dem Standardprodukt praktisch keine Änderung; wir waren nur fünf Grad kälter."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e2","text":"Antonius: Dann können wir mindestens festhalten: Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei der reinen Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig. Davor entsteht natürlich Aufwand."},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e3","text":"Antonius: Welche Daten aus dem Energieaudit dürfen wir veröffentlichen?"},
|
|
{"evidence_id":"e4","text":"Martin: Das ist weiterhin ungeklärt. Wir müssen die Freigabe noch klären."}
|
|
],
|
|
"expected_observations": [
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_1","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Bei der reinen Produktion gab es praktisch keine Änderung gegenüber dem Standardprodukt.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"eigene Anlage, reine Produktion, Standardprodukt|reine Produktion"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_2","evidence_id":"e1","content":"Die Produktion erfolgte fünf Grad kälter.","target":"obs_1","relation":"qualifies","modality":"factual","temporality":"completed","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"fünf Grad kälter|5 Grad"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_3","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Gegenüber Virgin Material ist bei reiner Produktion kein zusätzlicher Aufwand notwendig.","target":"obs_1","relation":"supports","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"accepted","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"reine Produktion gegenüber Virgin Material|Virgin Material"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_4","evidence_id":"e2","content":"Vor der reinen Produktion entsteht Aufwand.","target":"obs_3","relation":"limits_scope","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"absent","clarification_need":"none","scope":"vor der reinen Produktion|davor"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_5","evidence_id":"e3","content":"Es wird gefragt, welche Energieaudit-Daten veröffentlicht werden dürfen.","target":"discussion_subject","relation":"none","modality":"information_question","temporality":"unspecified","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","scope":"Veröffentlichung von Energieaudit-Daten|Energieaudit"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_6","evidence_id":"e4","content":"Die Veröffentlichungserlaubnis ist weiterhin ungeklärt.","target":"obs_5","relation":"supports","modality":"factual","temporality":"existing","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","scope":"Veröffentlichungserlaubnis|Freigabe"},
|
|
{"observation_id":"obs_7","evidence_id":"e4","content":"Die Freigabe muss noch geklärt werden.","target":"obs_5","relation":"supports","modality":"impersonal_necessity","temporality":"future","evaluation":"none","agreement":"none","responsibility":"none","person":null,"uncertainty":"present","clarification_need":"explicit","scope":"Freigabe zur Veröffentlichung|Freigabe"}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|