Files
meeting-lab/tests/gold/evil_meeting
admin f7ad9ba51f Establish prompt engineering baseline with Gold Standard tests
- introduce Gold Standard evaluation corpus
- document decision taxonomy
- define prompt-engineering methodology
- add regression workflow
- establish Prompt Version 2 baseline
- validate decision_simple, decision_deferred and decision_none
2026-07-30 12:13:10 +02:00
..

evil_meeting

Tests a deliberately difficult meeting with interruptions, corrections, topic switches, changed positions, absent referenced people, and near-decisions.

Every utterance is designed to trigger a common extraction failure. The meeting mentions Omar and Platform, but neither is a participant. It includes an explicit non-decision on migration and a real decision only on excluding FR-7 from Friday's batch.

Typical LLM mistakes:

  • Extracting a migration decision even though the group says no migration decision today.
  • Assigning Dana a todo even though she retracts it.
  • Treating Omar as a participant or technical owner.
  • Claiming Platform approved something despite being absent.
  • Losing the correction from "old export" to "nightly CSV job" and from API export to CSV export.
  • Treating Dana's opinion about rollout appearance as a fact or decision.