Introduce Meeting Context V1 with YAML schema, validation and template. Support optional --meeting-context during chunk extraction. Inject authoritative Meeting Context into extraction prompts. Record Meeting Context provenance in extraction output. Activate todos.md in shared prompt assembly. Strengthen responsibility attribution and decision/todo boundaries. Add focused Gold scenarios and validation tests. Update architecture and pipeline documentation.
21 lines
816 B
Markdown
21 lines
816 B
Markdown
# responsibility_attribution_negative
|
|
|
|
Tests that thematic proximity, department discussion and objection do not create
|
|
an action-item owner.
|
|
|
|
The scenario includes a Marketing participant who comments critically on
|
|
Business Development criteria. No one assigns that participant responsibility
|
|
for defining the criteria, and the participant does not accept such a task.
|
|
|
|
Scope:
|
|
|
|
- Do not assign Business Development criteria to the Marketing participant.
|
|
- Do not reclassify the Marketing participant as Business Development.
|
|
- Keep responsibility open unless explicitly assigned.
|
|
- Preserve the agreed next step to ask Business Development for an owner.
|
|
|
|
Exclusions:
|
|
|
|
- This scenario does not test whether the objection is extracted as a position.
|
|
- Position extraction is covered by `position_explicit_objection`.
|