70 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
70 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
# GTM-Hub meeting — 2026-09-07
|
|
|
|
Durable real-world regression case for a German GTM-Hub meeting. This is a
|
|
private real-meeting sample; do not publish or redistribute it outside the
|
|
intended development context.
|
|
|
|
## Case metadata
|
|
|
|
- **Case ID:** `gtm_hub_2026-09-07`
|
|
- **Meeting:** GTM-Hub Meeting, 2026-09-07
|
|
- **Duration:** about 78 min 36 s (4,715.52 s from existing diarization metadata)
|
|
- **Context:** a biweekly cross-functional board meeting about coordinating
|
|
projects for new markets, products, and applications; this discussion focused
|
|
initially on administrative questions and process definition.
|
|
- **Participants:** five confirmed participants: Malte Schnau, Henning
|
|
Ehrenberg, Björn-Erik Falkenau, Martin Tazl, and Jovana Husemann.
|
|
|
|
## Contents and provenance
|
|
|
|
`transcript/transcript.txt` is the exact compact diarized transcript
|
|
representation supplied to both comparable Meeting Assistant protocol calls;
|
|
it is the evidentiary source for evaluation. It is byte-identical to both
|
|
source runs' `protocol/transcript_input.txt` files (SHA-256
|
|
`42ac52223cac36eeeb7c01e6d6673b2fb50973c4365b5ddaafdd12927b2f12eb`).
|
|
The source plain Whisper transcripts were also identical between the two runs,
|
|
but are not copied because they were not the exact representation supplied to
|
|
protocol generation.
|
|
|
|
| Case file | Meeting Assistant source | Generation | Speaker status |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| `references/meeting_assistant_anonymous_speakers.md` | `data/meetings/gtm-hub-meeting-2026-09-07/runs/b895cda2_2026-09-07_11-18-54_GTM-HUB_20260909_025239/protocol.md` | 2026-09-09 01:00:46 UTC; `qwen3.8:27b` | Diarized with anonymous `SPEAKER_XX` labels; zero confirmed speaker-to-person mappings. |
|
|
| `references/meeting_assistant_speaker.md` | `data/meetings/gtm-hub-meeting-2026-09-07/runs/284a47be_2026-09-07_11-18-54_GTM-HUB_20260909_031106/protocol.md` | 2026-09-09 01:30:44 UTC; `qwen3.8:27b` | Diarized with the same anonymous labels plus five confirmed speaker-to-person mappings in the prompt/context. |
|
|
| `references/human_protocol_malte.txt` | copied human colleague reference supplied for this case | not generated | author identified as Malte by filename; preserve unchanged. |
|
|
|
|
Both runs have meeting ID `gtm-hub-meeting-2026-09-07`, title/date
|
|
`GTM-Hub Meeting 2026-09-07`, the same source recording name and size
|
|
(154,620,897-byte FLAC), the same 4,715.52-second prepared-audio duration, the
|
|
same Whisper model (`ggml-large-v3-turbo.bin`), and the same protocol model,
|
|
temperature (0), context window (32,768), and compact diarized transcript
|
|
selection. Their Meeting Context V1 files identify the same meeting and four
|
|
shared confirmed participants; the speaker-aware context additionally includes
|
|
Jovana Husemann and the five confirmed mappings. Exact run IDs, hashes, flags,
|
|
and paths are in `manifest.json`.
|
|
|
|
The source runs were separate full-pipeline executions: their audio,
|
|
transcription, diarization, and exact protocol-input artifacts are
|
|
byte-identical, but the mapped-speaker run is not operational evidence that it
|
|
reused the anonymous-speaker run's Whisper or diarization artifacts. This case
|
|
therefore compares equivalent diarized input conditions with different speaker
|
|
identity mappings only.
|
|
|
|
## Evaluation role
|
|
|
|
The transcript is the evidentiary source. The human colleague protocol is
|
|
**not** a gold protocol: it is a human reference showing what an experienced
|
|
participant considered worth preserving in a concise working protocol. The two
|
|
Meeting Assistant files are comparison variants. This case must not force a
|
|
system to imitate the human protocol verbatim.
|
|
|
|
This is a valuable regression case because a long, five-speaker discussion
|
|
contains competing mental models, repeated disagreement and clarification, and
|
|
only partial convergence. It distinguishes strategic collection/evaluation and
|
|
coordination from QMS/process documentation and operational project work. It
|
|
also discusses responsibility repeatedly without always creating a concrete
|
|
personal commitment.
|
|
|
|
See `evaluation.md` for the qualitative comparison and explicit regression
|
|
expectations. No audio, raw model response, container log, or other unrelated
|
|
run artifacts are intentionally included.
|